E
easy_tiger
Guest
LeeToRainesToRoach said:he's just another schmoe with opinions like the rest of us.
well, us anyway.
LeeToRainesToRoach said:he's just another schmoe with opinions like the rest of us.
This country enabled him to become rich? The country that stole the land from his ancestors, that abused, murdered, raped, beat, neglected and tried to eliminate his people? That country? That country helped him? Anthony Mundine's success is despite this country, not thanks to it. It's thanks to him.LeeToRainesToRoach said:I'm not even aware of any black supremacist comments he might've made. But if you refuse to stand for the national anthem and get booed, even hated, I say you asked for it, you deserve it. And after this terrible country enabled him to become richer than most, it's the height of hypocrisy.
Hopefully he fades away into obscurity 'cos without the gloves, he's just another schmoe with opinions like the rest of us.
Tigers of Old said:Not sure about outstanding sportsman but sure an outstanding conman.
Coburgtiger said:I can tell you, I'd never support a Richmond player who said this:
JoMamma said:Three world titles and 3 State of Origin appearances before turning 25 aren't outstanding enough for you?
Tough crowd....
spook said:This country enabled him to become rich? The country that stole the land from his ancestors, that abused, murdered, raped, beat, neglected and tried to eliminate his people? That country? That country helped him? Anthony Mundine's success is despite this country, not thanks to it. It's thanks to him.
He didn't stand for the anthem, who gives a *smile*. Why would he? How could he? Besides, it's a sh!t song, and patriotism is ignorance wrapped in *smile*.
spook said:This country enabled him to become rich? The country that stole the land from his ancestors, that abused, murdered, raped, beat, neglected and tried to eliminate his people? That country? That country helped him? Anthony Mundine's success is despite this country, not thanks to it. It's thanks to him.
Back at ya.easy said:in scintillating form
I am?LeeToRainesToRoach said:You're claiming a policy of genocide
spook said:I am?
I tend to agree on this point. When I was a primary school kid in the 1980s-90s, my recollection is that we were a much more carefree and apathetic country. I never remember ever singing the National anthem at school assembly. ANZAC Day was essentially just a solumn day of Remembrance. Etc. Now all this stuff is pumped up and practiced with such mindless, pumped up, pseudo-religious reverence. I certainly see it with my kid’s school events.spook said:This country
He didn't stand for the anthem, who gives a *smile*. Why would he? How could he? Besides, it's a sh!t song, and patriotism is ignorance wrapped in *smile*.
JoMamma said:Three world titles and 3 State of Origin appearances before turning 25 aren't outstanding enough for you?
Tough crowd....
Tigers of Old said:Crap sports anyway. ;D
LeeToRainesToRoach said:If not genocide, what would you call that?
LeeToRainesToRoach said:“Tried to eliminate his people”.
If not genocide, what would you call that?
tigersnake said:A policy of genoocide is not a big stretch. A lot of smart people say it happened, plenty of evidence to back them up. It might not have been consistently or have been applied across every regime and region at the same time, but there is plenty of evidence that it reared its head on and off in different regions, I shake my head whenever anyone carries on as if its a crazy claim, that's crazy. The native police in Queensland? look it up. Homesteads in Queensland that nailed murdered black peoples ears to the walls of their entrance halls? It happened. Massacres all over the country in response to petty offences? Nah, the idea that the colonists tried to systematically wipe out black? crazy idea. Kind of makes me feel uncomfortable, therefore it must not have happened. That is the logic at work here.
Giardiasis said:So one bonafide documented case of 30 aboriginals being murdered is enough to justify the claim of genocide? There were what over half a million aboriginals in 1788? Seems the evidence is a wee bit light on.
Yeah having to go to all the effort to make rational arguments is such a drag brahtigersnake said:this is what we gotta deal with
Giardiasis said:Yeah having to go to all the effort to make rational arguments is such a drag brah
So 0.004% of a population are murdered = genocide? Perhaps you need to learn what rational means?tigersnake said:30 blacks killed have bona fides. Pretty rational stuff. But as usual, don't let me slow you down.
tigersnake said:A policy of genoocide is not a big stretch. A lot of smart people say it happened, plenty of evidence to back them up. It might not have been consistently or have been applied across every regime and region at the same time, but there is plenty of evidence that it reared its head on and off in different regions, I shake my head whenever anyone carries on as if its a crazy claim, that's crazy. The native police in Queensland? look it up. Homesteads in Queensland that nailed murdered black peoples ears to the walls of their entrance halls? It happened. Massacres all over the country in response to petty offences? Nah, the idea that the colonists tried to systematically wipe out black? crazy idea. Kind of makes me feel uncomfortable, therefore it must not have happened. That is the logic at work here.