Animal Welfare | PUNT ROAD END | Richmond Tigers Forum
  • IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.

Animal Welfare

A lot of the reaction to animal welfare issues can be cultural.
Some people find whale slaughters abhorrent, others dislike Fox Hunting

Vegetarians are at least consistent
 
Fox hunting should be banned straightaway and also the bullfighting. Hate that stuff.

One cool thing about the drought is that duck hunting has been postponed again.
 
Michael said:
Whats your position on Kangaroo culls Mr 6?

I'm for it if the numbers aren't sustainable. And they're causing damage to other animals and crops.

and if it can be done humanely.
 
I dont know enough about the whales, but the media images are pretty horrific. If the species is endangered they shouldnt be allowed to do it. Or if its for some rare delicacy then its wrong too.
 
Six Pack said:
Fox hunting should be banned straightaway and also the bullfighting. Hate that stuff.

Fox-hunting should be expanded here in Australia, not banned.

Foxes are foreign vermin that kills our native wildlife....and people should be encouraged to eradicate them (as well as rabbits).
 
Liverpool said:
Fox-hunting should be expanded here in Australia, not banned.

Foxes are foreign vermin that kills our native wildlife....and people should be encouraged to eradicate them (as well as rabbits).

i was referring specifically to the hunt in the UK which is barbaric.

I'm all for them getting shot as vermin here.
 
Six Pack said:
I heard Peter Singer speak on this issue last year.

His basic position on vegetarianism is that if we choose to eat meat we are putting our own enjoyment above that of the pain and suffering of the animal.

Singer is the best philosopher I've ever heard, sixer. He's got a V12 thought processor and he can drive it. And as you say, the vegos are consistent.

Michael said:
Life would be grim without meat

Unless you're on the menu. ;D Whats that saying about breakfast: the chicken was dedicated but the pig was committed.

My own view was that the spectacular examples of animal suffering are the least interesting. Horses breaking legs on race tracks, foxes being hunted by scores of jacketed luddites, baby seals on ice fields. But I'm reconsidering this view. Maybe they're at the heart of the matter. Still ruminating on this one. Have been for a while.

Singer has an excellent case IMO albeit a disconcerting one in its extremes.
 
When i heard him speak he actually upset a few people in the audience because he has softened his view on vegetarianism. This position is less militant i guess, as he now says he realises that he cant change everyone by having such a hard line on the eating of meat. He is now advocating the ethical eating of meat, if u have to eat it.

I'll try and remember his reasonings and examples of this. My head is a bit blank at the moment.
 
Six Pack said:
He is now advocating the ethical eating of meat, if u have to eat it.

I'll try and remember his reasonings and examples of this. My head is a bit blank at the moment.

Wow. Yeah, see what you can remember, thanks, 1/4 slab.
 
Dyer'ere said:
Singer is the best philosopher I've ever heard, sixer.
No disrespect intended to your good self Jack,but you need to listen to more philosphers then.

Whats that saying about breakfast: the chicken was dedicated but the pig was committed.
An underated joke.
 
Aint many I've had the privilege of hearing many topliners (in person) evo but Singer is outstanding on his feet.

And his reasoning is absolutely flawless. I'd back him one on one against Socrates. ;D Of course Socrates will not have the right of reply.

Have you had much exposure to Singer?
 
I recall reading that man only started truly intellectually developing when we started eating a protein diet based upon fish and meat, which allowed our brains to develop much better than they had to date on a vege diet.

Sounds like to me vegetarianism is self inflicted devolution, so I'll stick to my steak or baked fish, and let you guys bogart the mung beans ;D
 
Dyer'ere said:
Have you had much exposure to Singer?
Not personally but I know his work.

I don't mind him actually,just think he's over rated(as a philosopher)
 
Dyer, from memory he was discussing the ethics of what we eat. this also included the importing of food from overseas when we had a product of the same avaialble here.

he went on a bit with the usual horror stories about battery hens and feedlot pigs etc, but he was preaching mainly to the converted at the lecture i went to.

he figured that he wont get everyone to become a vego so he was advocating that people eat meat ethically. This included not eating eggs from battery hens, not eating pork from feed lots etc but seeking out alternatives, of which there are plenty. He also argued that we should source our food from local providers and also only what is normally in season.

so if u know a local market gardener try to get yr vegies from them. or local fish co-ops etc. This was better for the environment too. It also meant that as an individual u were actively trying to find out more about what u eat rather than just buying a bag of carrots at the supermarket.

he also fielded questions on his book about those people (freegans) who were eating food out of bins and dumpsters. that was interesting but grossed me out a bit.
 
Tiger74 said:
I recall reading that man only started truly intellectually developing when we started eating a protein diet based upon fish and meat, which allowed our brains to develop much better than they had to date on a vege diet.

Sounds like to me vegetarianism is self inflicted devolution, so I'll stick to my steak or baked fish, and let you guys bogart the mung beans ;D

Yeah, T74, the theory is that the massive growth in human brains about a million or so years ago was due to the availability of meat and fish. No reason to doubt it.

BTW I'm not convinced that Singer's arguments, at least as I understood them twenty years ago ;D hold for fish.

But if you think that eating processed red meat is good for your brain, well, maybe you're eating too much red meat. Try fish heads. ;D
 
evo said:
Not personally but I know his work.

I don't mind him actually,just think he's over rated(as a philosopher)

Did there used to be a philosophy thread? I recall reading some entertaining discourse between you and that Curt Antsy Bear. Maybe it's on general...

Six Pack said:
Dyer, from memory he was discussing the ethics of what we eat. this also included the importing of food from overseas when we had a product of the same avaialble here.

he went on a bit with the usual horror stories about battery hens and feedlot pigs etc, but he was preaching mainly to the converted at the lecture i went to.

he figured that he wont get everyone to become a vego so he was advocating that people eat meat ethically. This included not eating eggs from battery hens, not eating pork from feed lots etc but seeking out alternatives, of which there are plenty. He also argued that we should source our food from local providers and also only what is normally in season.

so if u know a local market gardener try to get yr vegies from them. or local fish co-ops etc. This was better for the environment too. It also meant that as an individual u were actively trying to find out more about what u eat rather than just buying a bag of carrots at the supermarket.

he also fielded questions on his book about those people (freegans) who were eating food out of bins and dumpsters. that was interesting but grossed me out a bit.

Excellent. I love this Freegan idea. http://www.freegan.info/ Now these are idealists. ;D