-
IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.
911 Truth Movement
- Thread starter Harry
- Start date
Disco08 said:
Now, this is exactly what I'm talking about.
Larry and a demo team could have done it, sure. But aren't you forgetting one tiny detail? Let me remind you.
THE TWO FREAKIN' PLANES THAT CRASHED INTO THE BUILDINGS ON THE EXACT SAME DAY THAT LARRY PRESSED DOWN ON THE DETONATOR WILE E. COYOTE STYLE
Pure coincidence and nothing to do with Larry's little self-contained plot, I'm sure.
See. Never seen you post in all caps either.
Larry and Lew have obvious connections to people in the Bush regime. For a start George's brother but there's more. They're also principles at the WTC. Bush gives them the tip that al Qaeda is going to fly planes into the twin towers on 9/11 and leaves it at that. The government has nothing to do with the controlled demos or the plan to cash in on the attack.
Why would you lease buildings full of asbestos anyway?
http://rense.com/general81/bushislv.htm
Larry and Lew have obvious connections to people in the Bush regime. For a start George's brother but there's more. They're also principles at the WTC. Bush gives them the tip that al Qaeda is going to fly planes into the twin towers on 9/11 and leaves it at that. The government has nothing to do with the controlled demos or the plan to cash in on the attack.
Why would you lease buildings full of asbestos anyway?
http://rense.com/general81/bushislv.htm
evo said:
And it's Obama time now not Bush.
[youtube=560,315] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ENulG-ZYaWU [/youtube]
So you bring up the massive/complex conspiracy conundrum. You ask me to remind you of the simpler possibility which you ignored in conversation not long ago and when I post it you confuse it for me asserting conspiracy and mock me for being a hypocrite. It's just affection though right? :hihi
As a simple possibility, what's wrong with it?
As a simple possibility, what's wrong with it?
the weirdest thing about Obama and this whole saga was the way the dealt with Bin Laden after they caught him.TigerForce said:
Spend a decade and mucho dinero hunting enemy no1 and when they finally find him rather than gloating his body is hurredly whisked away and dumped at sea
Freezer said:
Oh, dear. Please, don't.
Nice account by OBL's killer in Esquire. Sad aftermath. Broken marriage, no pension. Expect him to get a flow of donations to help him out.
The American justice system is about the accused trying to prove their innocence? I thought it was about distraction from the truth and confusing the issue to allow the guilty to go free. Defence lawyers will do anything to not allow the truth to be told.TigerForce said:
And governments are no better.
Reading through bits and pieces of this thread there are definitely a whole bunch of questions that deserve answers. Sadly those answers will never be given. One thing that is fact is that governments do and will, from time time, kill for gain. Corporations do it illegally and legally under permission from governments who sometimes benefit financially from these deaths.
Greed motivates individuals to do horrific things to their fellow humans without conscience. Many powerful and wealthy individuals benefitted from the obnoxiously titled "War on terror."
What will a government do to make money? Almost anything as long as they think they can get away with it.
I had a scroll through this thread cause its been going off and i thought it must be good
FWIW, its not, and I cant work out what anyones point of view is.
Carry on.
FWIW, its not, and I cant work out what anyones point of view is.
Carry on.
Disco08 said:
Somewhat ironic statement.
If you go back over my posts in this thread, I think there is fair bit more to them than just pointing out the flaws in your debating style. Do you disagree? You still haven't pointed out to me why the flaws in the OR haven't been debated in a reputable engineering or scientific journal. For someone who has appealed to the lack of scientific merit in the official position, the method of disseminating the troofers position through websites, youtube vids and self-published journals is about as anti-scientific as it gets.
As for your allusion in the above sentence that I am "unstoppable" when I have the upper hand and therefore my position isn't as strong in this thread. Two things in regards to that. Firstly, I have come and gone from this thread, raising questions when I have the time and pointing out inconsistencies where I see them. I don't have as much time to spend on it, hence my occasional appearances. Secondly, and more importantly, my area of expertise is in biology, so I am much more comfortable providing a strong opinion that can be backed up on a thread like evolution vs creationism. I don't pretend to be an expert in engineering and rely on actual experts to explain these things. This is why the peer-reviewed literature is such an important source of information and is my first source of information in these situations. The complete lack of support for your side from that source is telling (as I've mentioned before).
tigergollywog said:
Despite the very real possibility that a 120 metre catapult could have been stealthily assembled at a secret launching pad in Staten island by foreign students enrolled in roman military history courses with no 2nd term electives chosen, don’t fall for the big ball theory like I did.
