911 Truth Movement

[KnightersRevenge]

"Honest research" perhaps, but if you submitted that as an essay in a first year history course at university, you'd fail. The lecturer's comments would read thusly - "you have strung together a series of unrelated events from a set of mostly secondary sources. Your essay lacks any coherent narrative and the conclusions you draw seem unrelated to any argument made in the body of the text. Writing history is not the same as writing a laundry list. Suggest transferring to creative a writing course, but please address your confusion over the use of apostrophes."

Heh.

PRE really needs a like button.

Here you go:

 

[tigersnake]

Lighten up dude.

"Honest research" perhaps, but if you submitted that as an essay in a first year history course at university, you'd fail. The lecturer's comments would read thusly - "you have strung together a series of unrelated events from a set of mostly secondary sources. Your essay lacks any coherent narrative and the conclusions you draw seem unrelated to any argument made in the body of the text. Writing history is not the same as writing a laundry list. Suggest transferring to creative a writing course, but please address your confusion over the use of apostrophes."

That is spookily spot on. Larry again?

 

[tigergollywog]

how does thermite compare to vegemite and promite?

 

[Disco08]

I studied it about as hard as it merited study. I used to teach at university so you get pretty good at assessing merit pretty quickly.

So in other words you glanced at it and dismissed it because you believe yourself to be of superior intellect to the author.

Actually, there are quite a few sites detailing the history of controlled demolition. http://www.implosionworld.com/industryhistory.htm http://science.howstuffworks.com/engineering/structural/building-implosion.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demolition

Unfortunately I can't find any sites that detail "the history of surreptitious controlled demolition".

Still missing the point about not making it too obvious eh? Why use C4 which is fairly standard when you can use a newer less common technology?

They resembled controlled demolition in the sense that the buildings fell down. Not in many other ways. Of course, it was all part of the cunning plan that they looked different to other controlled demolitions because that would have been just too obvious if Larry was photographed next to a large pushdown detonator from Acme Co. like Wile E Coyote.

Only in the sense that the magical thermite fairy theory isn't disproven either. Have you got any evidence that contradicts my theory that magical fairies installed magical thermite dust the midnight before the buildings came down?

You must be the smartest guy ever. Seriously. Not only do you know more about chemistry than a guy who earned his degree with distinction but you know more about controlled demolition than a handful of controlled demolition experts and high rise engineers and architects.

I have no historical data on when and where Bush kept his bazookas, so I can't really comment. Would have been a great headline though - "President shoots down plane load of civilian passengers and a few terrorists". I could imagine Arnie doing it as governor of California, would have made a great movie.

Larry's decision to go to breakfast across town? Perhaps he heard they made a nice Eggs Benedict.

Maybe. Great day to need a better Eggs Benny than the one at the WTC though. Lucky guy. The NY Times apparently reckons he spent every morning at the Wndows On The World restaurant after his lease was finalised. Every morning except 9/11 of course but no doubt that's nothing more than coincidence and we shouldn't add it to the other coincidences and oddities surrounding Larry becuase the implied conspiracy doesn't bear thinking about. Right?

Perhaps the fact the Sarasota Herald Tribune reported the placement of anti air missiles on the roof of the Colony Beach & Tennis Resort on September 10 gives a clue as to the unusualness of such an event. Do we see similar reports from other excursions Bush makes? Of course even if proven to be anomalous this fact is just more coincidence that needs to be ignored because of the massive conspiract it certainly implies.

Sure do. For example, there were a lot of newspaper reports at the time that told me that a bunch of terrorists flew planes into WTC in the service of OBL. In fact, these sorts of stories filled the newspapers for weeks and months. On the other hand, I couldn't find any newspaper reports stating that the WTC were demolished with thermite, or that George and Larry rigged the whole thing.

Funny that, I guess your faith in newspaper reports is misplaced.

Yep and those reports fit perfectly with the LIHOP theory. So you put credence in those reports but not in the ones that seem to paint a picture of foreknowledge and criminal cover up?

 

[tigersnake]

Perhaps the fact the Sarasota Herald Tribune reported the placement of anti air missiles on the roof of the Colony Beach & Tennis Resort on September 10 gives a clue as to the unusualness of such an event.

Are you saying the placement of missiles gives a clue as to the unusualness of the placement of missiles?

 

[Disco08]

No. The reporting of the placement gives a clue as to the unusual nature of the event. Do newspapers usually report mundane events?

 

[tigersnake]

Perhaps the fact the Sarasota Herald Tribune reported the placement of anti air missiles on the roof of the Colony Beach & Tennis Resort on September 10 gives a clue as to the unusualness of such an event. Do we see similar reports from other excursions Bush makes? Of course even if proven to be anomalous this fact is just more coincidence that needs to be ignored because of the massive conspiract it certainly implies.

This paragraph is thought provoking, and a possible game changer, but I can't decipher it.

 

[tigersnake]

No. The reporting of the placement gives a clue as to the unusual nature of the event. Do newspapers usually report mundane events?

????

Putting missiles on a hotel roof, if it happened, is newsworthy anytime. Knowing the nature of Presidential security, it doesn't sound incredible to me.

OK I've deciphered that para now.

 

[Disco08]

Bush had anti aircraft missiles placed on the roof of the resort he stayed at on September 10. If this is an anomalous event can you see the implication? Can you see how added to Jeb's executive orders people might suspect these 2 were aware that something was about to happen?

 

[tigertim]

He,s right. Larry was guilty....he and all of the Jews! God damn them....

http://thepopulist.net/2010/01/27/the-jewish-question/

 

[tigersnake]

Bush had anti aircraft missiles placed on the roof of the resort he stayed at on September 10. If this is an anomalous event can you see the implication? Can you see how added to Jeb's executive orders people might suspect these 2 were aware that something was about to happen?

I'd suggest it wasn't an anolomous event. Presidential security is quite amazing.

 

[Disco08]

We should be able to find plenty of other similar reports then right? Why would this fact even be reported if it wasn't at the very least unusual?

 

[tigersnake]

We should be able to find plenty of other similar reports then right? Why would this fact even be reported if it wasn't at the very least unusual?

Any Presidential visit is unusual, and a big deal. All aspects tend to be reported. I have no doubt we could find similar reports. Its not earth shattering stuff

 

[Baloo]

Any Presidential visit is unusual, and a big deal. All aspects tend to be reported. I have no doubt we could find similar reports. Its not earth shattering stuff

Prove it. Prove its not unusual. Until you can, the facts remain that putting anti air missiles on the roof of GWB's holiday house proves Larry had invested in hologram technology which Halliburton and the Saudis developed in an attempt to repel the Vulcan invasion during the Vietnam war.

 

[Disco08]

Good to see you posting with your usual maturity Baloo.

Any Presidential visit is unusual, and a big deal. All aspects tend to be reported. I have no doubt we could find similar reports. Its not earth shattering stuff

I've tried with no luck. See how you go.

 

[Baloo]

Good to see you posting with your usual maturity Baloo.

What does that mean disco ?

 

[tigersnake]

Good to see you posting with your usual maturity Baloo.

I've tried with no luck. See how you go.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1389837/High-security-Barack-Obama-visit-Ireland.html

A few more there

 

[AngryAnt]

WAIT UP hold the PHONE ... THIS CHANGES EVERYTHING

35 Reasons Micro-Nukes Were Utilized to Demolish the WTC Cores on 9/11

June 28, 2012

Editors Note: Micro-Nukes were likely used at the base core in conduction with nano-thermite and C4. Multiple demolitions were used.

Related Article & Videos:

9/11 Cover up: Standard Controlled Demolition or Possible Micro Nukes?

Video: Micro Nukes Took Down the Towers (Part 1)

Video: Micro Nukes Took Down the Towers (Part 2)

Video: Craters Left at WTC Site

Why was it called Ground Zero?

Here are the reasons:

Heat generation at ground zero for six months (china syndrome)
Inability to quench ground zero heat with water
Red hot/molten steel at ground zero
Missing core columns from ground zero (vaporized during destruction)
Spreading of sand at ground zero consistent with attempts to limit radiation
Washing of steel recovered from pile consistent with radiation decontamination
Extreme security for ground zero steel shipments consistent with limiting access to radioactive steel
Extreme security at ground zero, limiting exposure, view of devastation
Extreme pulverization of WTC concrete into very fine particles
Disappearance of over one thousand human bodies from WTC debris
Disappearance of furniture, phones, filing cabinets and computers from WTC debris
Disappearance of elevator doors, office doors, office cubicle walls, toilets and sinks from WTC debris
Several floor fragments fused together in “meteorite” object
Bone fragments sprayed into Bankers Trust upper floor during destruction
Multiple blast waves during destruction of tower
Large fireballs during initiation of WTC1 destruction
Small backpack-sized fission nukes exist
Fission-nuke technology well-established
Low efficiency of fission nukes ensures leftover radioactive fragments and China syndrome
EMP formation during tower destruction (exploding cars, partial burning)
Description of heat in WTC blast cloud
Extensive cover-up of ground zero air by EPA
High rate of cancers, including thyroid cancer typically associated with radiation exposure, in ground zero responders
Melted, hanging skin in WTC survivor Felipe David in absence of fire
Vaporized press and crumpled steel door in WTC basement reported by Pecoraro
Steel beam bent in U, without cracking, evidence of extreme high temps
Steel beam bent in U has layer of molten metal on surface
Extreme overall devastation of two massive towers and blasted out Ground Zero aftermath
Appearance of fantastical, nonsensical DEW theory by likely govt agents– uses evidence of nukes (EMP, extreme pulverization of tower into dust) but denies nukes at all costs
Appearance of fantastical, nonsensical thermite (super nano-thermite) theory by likely govt agents– uses evidence of nukes (molten steel, china syndrome) but denies nukes at all costs
Small iron microspheres found by Jones et al in WTC dust— evidence of steel vaporization by high temps of nukes
Pyroclastic debris cloud during WTC destruction
Upwards jutting debris trails reminiscent of debris trails formed during underground nuke test
Small bright flashes during destruction of both towers
Extremely compacted ground zero debris

Spooked’s Bio: The official 9/11 story is a lie. The 9/11 plane hijackings and crashes were clever hoaxes.

The WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7 towers were brought down by demolition, and there is evidence for the use of small nuclear bombs in the demolition of WTC1 and 2.

All in all, 9/11 was a massive and cruel hoax foisted upon the world, done in order to spark the obscene “war on terror”, to cover up financial fraud and to further the ends of the global elite. 9/11 was only the most egregious of several other recent false-flag terror operations.

http://intellihub.com/2012/06/28/35-reasons-micro-nukes-were-utilized-to-demolish-the-wtc-on-911/

Here are some nice pictures from informative ads from the same website!

This stuff is fantastic, I've ordered two home shelters, a seed store, and a water flouridation removal kit already! THANKS INTELLIHUB

 

[Disco08]

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1389837/High-security-Barack-Obama-visit-Ireland.html

A few more there

The airport had anti aircraft missiles. That seems expectable. Putting them on the roof of a resort seems quite extraordinary.

 

[tigersnake]

The airport had anti aircraft missiles. That seems expectable. Putting them on the roof of a resort seems quite extraordinary.

Here you go again with the extreme language. And also with the logically flawed re-framing of evidence. The evidence you think supports your case is 'quite extraordinary' because that what you need it to be to support your case. Also the similar evidence I supplied is 'expectable', mundane, everyday.

I'll say it again, to stick a mobile anti-aircraft gun in the vicininity of a Presidential visit, to me, is perfectly normal and expected. Resort, airport, skyscraper, wherever the pres is visiting. Also, the airport didn't have anti-aircraft missiles, they were put there for the Pres's visit, another little trick of emphasis there.