Couldn't give a stuff about what's on the card. Just as long as it gets me in the gate on match day I'll b happy.
Does the women’s team membership card have me on it?
Couldn't give a stuff about what's on the card. Just as long as it gets me in the gate on match day I'll b happy.
I think we need to get past the comparison between AFL and AFLW as if they are supposed to be the same product.
You don't hear people go to any other standard of game and say this is pathetic, the skills are nowhere near AFL players standard and yet they do it all the time with AFLW.
Once you find a way to enjoy it on its merits and recognise that it is the elite standard for Women's football and it is not and never will be AFL then it is very entertaining.
Much the same way that Tom Lynch is never going to play like Wayne Carey but that doesn't mean I don't enjoy watching him.
I think we need to get past the comparison between AFL and AFLW as if they are supposed to be the same product.
And you Midsy, have just hit the nail on the head!Yet the AFL keep marketing it as though it is.
And the women what equal everything as though they think it is as well.
And the women want equal everything as though they think it is as well.
Do they? I'm yet to hear of a woman wanting 'equal everything' - or equal anything, for that matter.
I for one am very happy to see the cross promotion.
I think it is fantastic, AFLW is the best thing to happen to football since the expansion to a national competition.
If anything, I'm disappointed there are separate memberships for the AFL and AFLW programs. I would have preferred every membership to increase by $5 and be a full club membership, which would have injected 500k into the AFLW program.
If anything, I'm disappointed there are separate memberships for the AFL and AFLW programs. I would have preferred every membership to increase by $5 and be a full club membership, which would have injected 500k into the AFLW program.
I agree with this. I won't be getting a Richmond AFLW membership but wouldn't have had an issue with a small increase to the club membership to help fund the women's program.
Totally agree. I looked at a AFLW membership but couldn't justify the cost, especially being interstate. It should be an add on, they'd easily pickup a lot of members. I guess it's a case of do they want just financial members, or members who'll actually go the games?
I’m about the same. I’m a grumpy old man in many ways but I’d love my daughter to have the same opportunities as my son in any endeavour so go girls!Im not terribly interested, but Im extremely supportive if that makes sense.
and Im sure if Richmond women are playing the Collingwood girls on the TV, I'll get pretty interested pretty quickly
Much the same way that Tom Lynch is never going to play like Wayne Carey but that doesn't mean I don't enjoy watching him.
Once you find a way to enjoy it on its merits and recognise that it is the elite standard for Women's football and it is not and never will be AFL then it is very entertaining.
Personally I don’t like watching elite women’s tennis, golf or basketball. They are all extremely inferior to the men’s games. And still lack the depth of the men’s games.
But I love women’s gymnastics, diving and swimming.
As for AFLW I have little interest but will support the tigers, especially against the traditional rivals. Unlikely to watch a whole game but wish them all the best.
Umm, it is an add on. You can get stand alone AFLW Foundation membership or, if you are already an RFC member it costs less as an add on.
I'm still not convinced AFLW Foundation membership is separate membership, it is a foundation not a club, the club is one and fields teams in AFL and AFLW.
DS