Greg Miller has been at the RFC for nearly a year now. His job role seems to be the backstop for all those people/areas that many of us consider have been performing poorly. For example, he's helping out Greg Beck, he's helping the match commitee, he's looking at the list, he's looking at this he's looking at that. He's the voice of the club when there's a fuss etc.
My point is what are the people that are responsible for these areas doing?? If they are not good enough get rid of them!! Don't appoint Santa's little helper. We have a CEO, a president, a coach, a match commitee, a director of football, Greg Hutchinson whatever his title is and a recruiting guy. Can someone tell me whose fault it is for the crap we have on the list and why today we are still paying Bourke and Daffy? Did we really need another chief costing us plenty to add to the confusion?
IF the coach is the problem, Miller has stifled us from being able to make a move this year by insisting on the contract change.
If Miller's role is to sort this mess out and then *smile* off, fine, but he needs to get cracking. If not , who is going to be responsible if the list doesn't improve dramatically?
My point is what are the people that are responsible for these areas doing?? If they are not good enough get rid of them!! Don't appoint Santa's little helper. We have a CEO, a president, a coach, a match commitee, a director of football, Greg Hutchinson whatever his title is and a recruiting guy. Can someone tell me whose fault it is for the crap we have on the list and why today we are still paying Bourke and Daffy? Did we really need another chief costing us plenty to add to the confusion?
IF the coach is the problem, Miller has stifled us from being able to make a move this year by insisting on the contract change.
If Miller's role is to sort this mess out and then *smile* off, fine, but he needs to get cracking. If not , who is going to be responsible if the list doesn't improve dramatically?