As an example of the myth I want to quote Sarah Jones, not as an authority, but as a typical voice in AFL ranks. She recently referred to GWS as "the best side in the AFL."
Now, that's contentious, sure. But to my mind it's preposterous. I think GWS is a side of proven hacks and failures. And for years now, those bearish about GWS have been calling them short on talent.
First I want to address the way narrative works. This time applied to GCS (the new hyperbole darling of the AFL), not GWS.
I cannot name all the commentators who've described Jack Lukosius as a superb kick, or a brilliant kick, or get it in his hands etc. Because they are too many. One recruiting manager described him as "the best kick ever to enter an AFL draft."
By and large, I expect a Jack Lukosius kick to hit an opponent's hands on the full. Dew is tweaking the JL game atm. Setting for shorter targets so there is some improvement. But. In short. The bloke can't kick.
With GWS and GCS nobody watches the games. So we're more inclined to believe what we hear and then check the Supercoach points. When Jack Lukosius kicks it relentlessly to three unmarked opponents 41m or more away that is not a clanger. It doesn't show up in the numbers.
Getting back to the recruiting manager who described him as the best kick ever to enter a draft, I think he got caught up in what I'm going to call "competitive echoing". I wanna say it too but be heard I must hit it harder, not to say it louder, but to give my assessment more weight.
Jack Lukosius is not just a very good kick, he's "the best kick ever to enter an AFL draft". [Listen to me.] Competitive echoing. It's about Note that I said it, not about accuracy. And we all competitive echo sometimes.
To date in his career, young Jack Lukosius has a real problem with his kicking. The other narrative is a myth.
Imagine a whole football club based on such narratives. Narratives that won't go away, despite the relentless failure of the mythologised.
We're about to look at GWS.
Now, that's contentious, sure. But to my mind it's preposterous. I think GWS is a side of proven hacks and failures. And for years now, those bearish about GWS have been calling them short on talent.
First I want to address the way narrative works. This time applied to GCS (the new hyperbole darling of the AFL), not GWS.
I cannot name all the commentators who've described Jack Lukosius as a superb kick, or a brilliant kick, or get it in his hands etc. Because they are too many. One recruiting manager described him as "the best kick ever to enter an AFL draft."
By and large, I expect a Jack Lukosius kick to hit an opponent's hands on the full. Dew is tweaking the JL game atm. Setting for shorter targets so there is some improvement. But. In short. The bloke can't kick.
With GWS and GCS nobody watches the games. So we're more inclined to believe what we hear and then check the Supercoach points. When Jack Lukosius kicks it relentlessly to three unmarked opponents 41m or more away that is not a clanger. It doesn't show up in the numbers.
Getting back to the recruiting manager who described him as the best kick ever to enter a draft, I think he got caught up in what I'm going to call "competitive echoing". I wanna say it too but be heard I must hit it harder, not to say it louder, but to give my assessment more weight.
Jack Lukosius is not just a very good kick, he's "the best kick ever to enter an AFL draft". [Listen to me.] Competitive echoing. It's about Note that I said it, not about accuracy. And we all competitive echo sometimes.
To date in his career, young Jack Lukosius has a real problem with his kicking. The other narrative is a myth.
Imagine a whole football club based on such narratives. Narratives that won't go away, despite the relentless failure of the mythologised.
We're about to look at GWS.