Well, for the past weekend many of you may have read the "One Percenters" thread on the Dyer-Tribe forum regarding some statistical analysis of the players in the league, so we can see (statistically) where our players stand against the rest of the league.
Being the first part of the analysis, I'd go through briefly how I got my data together.
Step 1: I went to pro sports and got a list of the players who had played the most amount of guys for each club.
Step 2: I reduced the amount of players down to a total of 22. I did this by eliminating players that had retired or been delisted, as they won't
be part of the action for 2006. This has a bit of a bearing on how things are done, as for example, some of the better players in each
position have retired due to injury or "other reasons" - like Ty Zantuck. Once this was done, I took a, possibly simplistic, viewpoint of
counting only the top players based on games played - with one exception. If there was a "star" player for a team that hadn't played
enough games to be in the top 22, I bumped the last person off and elevated them into the last position. I did this basically because in
2006, these players would be walk up starts into their teams. The only "star" that hasn't been given this favouritism is Luke Darcy,
simply because it's unlikely he'll play a game in 2006. Aaron Hamill and Josh Fraser were a couple to benefit from this "favouritism".
Step 3: Once I had my list of 22 players, I tried to allocate each player to their "likely" position on the ground. This can be very difficult as lots of
players aren't restricted to just being in one position. To aid in this I visited the Yahoo Sports Australia website, where they still have a
copy of every teams "Ins and outs" for every weekend of the year. I tried to get some feel for where the coaches named each player to
play. If there was a consistent trend, I'd put x player in y position. This isn't the "best" method, as we all know some coaches play games
with the team listings before a game, but I thought it was the best method to account for each player, especially for some of the
interstate teams I hadn't got to see very often. Yahoo Sports AFL Teams.
Step 4: This was the fun stuff, I took the stats from pro-sports and entered them into an excel spreadsheet, and played around with several
different formulae to try and demonstrate what might be some key indicators for each particular position.
Ok, now that's explained (and probably bored you to death, I'll go on with the stuff you really wanted to see.
Being the first part of the analysis, I'd go through briefly how I got my data together.
Step 1: I went to pro sports and got a list of the players who had played the most amount of guys for each club.
Step 2: I reduced the amount of players down to a total of 22. I did this by eliminating players that had retired or been delisted, as they won't
be part of the action for 2006. This has a bit of a bearing on how things are done, as for example, some of the better players in each
position have retired due to injury or "other reasons" - like Ty Zantuck. Once this was done, I took a, possibly simplistic, viewpoint of
counting only the top players based on games played - with one exception. If there was a "star" player for a team that hadn't played
enough games to be in the top 22, I bumped the last person off and elevated them into the last position. I did this basically because in
2006, these players would be walk up starts into their teams. The only "star" that hasn't been given this favouritism is Luke Darcy,
simply because it's unlikely he'll play a game in 2006. Aaron Hamill and Josh Fraser were a couple to benefit from this "favouritism".
Step 3: Once I had my list of 22 players, I tried to allocate each player to their "likely" position on the ground. This can be very difficult as lots of
players aren't restricted to just being in one position. To aid in this I visited the Yahoo Sports Australia website, where they still have a
copy of every teams "Ins and outs" for every weekend of the year. I tried to get some feel for where the coaches named each player to
play. If there was a consistent trend, I'd put x player in y position. This isn't the "best" method, as we all know some coaches play games
with the team listings before a game, but I thought it was the best method to account for each player, especially for some of the
interstate teams I hadn't got to see very often. Yahoo Sports AFL Teams.
Step 4: This was the fun stuff, I took the stats from pro-sports and entered them into an excel spreadsheet, and played around with several
different formulae to try and demonstrate what might be some key indicators for each particular position.
Ok, now that's explained (and probably bored you to death, I'll go on with the stuff you really wanted to see.