'twas split off to the "re Trent Cochtin" thread.TigerForce said:** Where are the previous 6 missing posts in this thread?? **
tigertim said:'twas split off to the "re Trent Cochtin" thread.
It was split into its own thread but that thread seems to have disappeared!TigerForce said:Isn't this it?
tigertim said:It was split into its own thread but that thread seems to have disappeared!
TigerForce said:** Where are the previous 6 missing posts in this thread?? **
I think TF was joking with the conspiracy line.rosy23 said:Conspiracy?...yeah sure. :
rosy23 said:Instead of attention seeking you could have contacted one of the mods privately or used the report to moderator function.
The article was removed for several reasons. It didn't include a link which is a legal requirement. It didn't indicate in any way where the article was from, who wrote it or the date. Articles belong on the What the Journos Say board not on Dyer Tribe where it was posted. The posts following the article quoted it, thus not having the links either, so they were removed as well.
The person who posted the article was contacted and invited to re-post on the Journos board and include the link if he so desired.
Conspiracy?...yeah sure. :
TigerForce said:OK, sorry I wasn't aware of what previously happened as I just logged in.
Attention seeking?? I just asked the question as I saw some previous posts missing after typing my comment. It looked confusing when reading through the thread page again.
Why not have a message "comments removed.." on what the mod has done within the thread just as you do when deleting a comment? I didn't know we had to PM or report to mod just for that.
I was joking with 'conspiracy' especially with the grin emoticon.
rosy23 said:Attention seeking was posting in red. There's no need to post a "comments removed" message. It only leads to further discussion about the moderating, taking the topic off-track, often with a bit of mod bashing thrown in for good measure. You certainly don't have to use report to moderator or send a pm but the site guidelines say moderating decisions won't be discussed publicly. The person whose post was removed in a situation like this is usually contacted with an explanation...as was the case this time.