-
IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.
Re: Blair's Boys - 2012 Trade Week Targets
- Thread starter SfB_AkA._DeLiCiOuS
- Start date
Rubbish post, Rubbish attitude.Jukes Extended said:
Unless RFC start advocating the drowning of puppies, missuse of child labour or use the term 'send em back where they came from' there is never a reason for not renewing your membership.
Stop being a bully boy sook and support your club. Dawes, pfft.
You're jumping at shadows. The club has been making some very good decisions recently. Threatening to nuke your membership because someone on an internet forum suggested we look at Chris dawes is madness. back the club, back the decision makers, back Blair hartley, he seems to be on the right path IMHO.Jukes Extended said:
SCOOP said:
Hmmmm. Not sure what that means.
Option 1- A romantic interlude with Disco? Not sure you're his type really.
Option 2- Enjoying a beer? Not sure how that's relevant to the quote.
Option 3- Gratuitous sniping without the guts to comment? No substance.
Jukes hasn't answered the question of what he's had a gutful of that you responded to. If you feel the need to respond how about actually saying something?
rosy23 said:
I'd had a gutful from a lot of people.
No reason to bring up specifics because I'm never gonna get anywhere, things like this never get resolved.....I'd rather just drop it and move along.
Jukes Extended said:
If you have genuine issues it's probably better to raise them. Things can be resolved. If there's no substance, or you don't wish to clarify, it's probably better not to make such comments in the first place. You quoted me to say you'd had a gutful. I'm obviously not the only one wondering what you meant. I'll split the comments from this thread and move to another board when I get a chance.
rosy23 said:
Good idea to move the comments to the appropriate thread I agree.
Main issue is that I've had some inbox messages that have been colorful to say the least....this has been going on for months.
I usually just ignore them.....only so much I can take though.
Jukes Extended said:
Why did you quote me to say you had a gutful if your main issues is with PMs you've received for months? I haven't sent you any.
You said you've had a gutful of a lot of people. Still doesn't make it clear why you quoted me to say it.
If you're being harassed behind the scenes by a lot of people, or even one person, on this forum report the PMs and the Mods will look into it.
rosy23 said:
You've never said anything to me where I've really been offended to be honest, I'm not that fragile.
It was a bit of built up frustration because of all the shots a few individuals have fired at me lately....(not you)
You were labeling me in your comment, I wasn't offended by it but I didn't enjoy it....I suppose it was the straw that broke the camels back.
"I've had a gutful" comment was of everything that's happened lately on PRE towards me.
If I get anymore PM's like I have...... I will report,
I haven't had an for about a week, so hopefully that's the end of it.
Jukes Extended said:
I'm happy to explain my comments that you call labeling. My comments were all in reference to your own recent posting.
1- Irrational.
A reference to your strange posting last weekend. I said I was barracking for the Hawks and you responded Go Pies. I later said I hoped an interstate team won and you responded that you are Victorian and always hope interstate teams lose unless they are playing Collingwood. When I mentioned that didn't make sense that you want Pies to beat Hawks but only want Collingwood to lose to an interstate team you said if you knew I was going to interrogate you you would have said Hawthorn but you chose Collingwood cos they are universally hated. Very strange posting and a bit of a persecution complex inferring I was cross examining you when it was you who chose to respond to my comments in the first place.
2- Sexist.
After that strange posting you finished with what was obviously intended as a put down of me by saying "It's done, I don't pay attention to what women think when sports is concerned anyway". That's not only sexist, it also raises the question of why you responded to my posts in the first place.
3- Fickle.
Self explanatory when you said if we got a certain player you wouldn't be buying a membership. It's your right to have such a sad attitude but it's understandable if others voice their disapproval of it.
