Cambo: no answer to Richardson puzzle (Herald-Sun) | PUNT ROAD END | Richmond Tigers Forum
  • IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.

Cambo: no answer to Richardson puzzle (Herald-Sun)

mightytiges

The greatest Tiger of them all - Jack Dyer R.I.P.
Dec 16, 2002
1,195
0
18 August 2003
Herald Sun
By MICHAEL STEVENS

MATTHEW Richardson's future at Punt Rd continues to be a topic of intense speculation.

Even Richmond captain Wayne Campbell became embroiled in it during a pre-match interview yesterday.

Campbell was asked: Do you think you and Richmond might be better off without Matthew Richardson?

Do you think he might be better off playing somewhere else?

And Campbell's response? "Dunno".

"It's a question that gets asked quite often and one of those questions that hasn't got a definitive answer, I don't think," Campbell said on Triple M.

"People can think different things. At the moment he's going OK. He would like to be a long-term Richmond player and be a one-club player, and I think the club would like that as well.

"He's played most positions he can play, where he can play, which is on the forward line.

"The last couple of weeks he's played on a wing, so (he's played everywhere) other than the backline, but I don't think he's a natural backman.

"We've tried him in most positions up forward and he's been pretty successful a lot of the time.

"I think he's third on the contested marks list, so he's doing a couple of things right."

Campbell was also queried the Tigers' style of play, which often overlooks Richardson leads in favour of chipping or running the ball into the forward line.

"In the past couple of weeks we've played ordinary footy like that. We've chipped around on the backline.

"But I don't think we've been a side that's done that for three or four years," Campbell said.

"It was embarrassing to have more touches than St Kilda last week and get beaten by the amount (80 points) that we did, but I don't think over the past three or four years we've been a team like that.

"We've been a team that's been pretty efficient in going forward and getting it long.

"If anything, we've been accused of bombing it too much, so both styles haven't worked."
 
Heard on 3AW that the board is seriously thinking about trading him........goodbye richo........you can thank frawely for your departure.
 
Im starting to buy into the trade Richo theory. As much as i'd hate ot see him go it just seems ot point ot making sense.

Richo is no longer a young fella and with his limited life left in the comp taking into account injuries we are not going to be a genuine premiership threat by then. If he is not going to be a part of our next flag we probably should trade him for a few top notch draft picks and trade ayoung tall such as Keplar Bradley to replace him and let him wiht youth on his side be a part of our next flag. We would have to take the right deal and make sure we are not ripped off but if we can get a few good early picks, one good first rounder involved as a minimum then to me it makes sense.

I love him dont want to see him go but it seems to make sense to me. Groom a young side that can win consistent premierships, I dont think Richo as much as he deserves to be is going ot be a part of one here.
 
We've helped Richo become the player he is and don't have the ability to turn him around. A strong Club could only help him.

I don't know if he's gone DF but, in the past, he's been almost emphatic that he has wanted to stay at Richmond. Didn't get that impression last Thursday night on the Footy Show. Maybe he has relaxed his thoughts on going elsewhere.

I look forward to the day when this footy Club starts to get the best out of players, rather than turning them into mixed up, maligned and resented footballers?

For the sake of the young players at the Club now and those still to come, I hope they realise how the development of players has been neglected and hurts us. If we want to go anywhere, we need someone who can get the best out of people. Skill and ability don't really mean much otherwise.
 
Harry said:
Heard on 3AW that the board is seriously thinking about trading him........goodbye richo........you can thank frawely for your departure.

Yes I read a Mike Sheahan article that says the same thing.

One would think that the board has no say in who we keep and who we trade - isn't that the reason we got Greg Miller. :-\

Richo doesn't want to go anywhere, and from what I have been told wont be going anywhere. :-X
 
KL, if they were going to trade Richo, wouldn't you think there would be board level consultation? I do.
 
All these player problems that we are currently experiencing such as where to play Richo, Bowden down on form etc.... all comes back to the fool running the show. We have all these talented players running around headless, contributing nothing and everybody screaming for them to be traded.

Player development is something that Frawley truely has no idea about.

I feel sorry for guys like Richo and Bowden that have to play under this fool
 
The only teams interested in Richo would be those where it is the metaphorical 5 to midnite. IE like Adelaide and Carey this year.
Who is in that boat?
The Bummers could be as their better players are 28 plus. Also the Lions. Those in the rebuilding phase wouldn't touch him unless we paid most of his salary.
I say keep him unless someone offers us a deal too good to be true and pays part of his salary.
 
29 goals from 17 games is not good enough. He has let the club down in every aspect this season and at 28 years of age is past it.

If The club can get a first round pick for him them take it.
 
My very good sources tell me he will be at Shell stadium next year. If the cats saw something in mitchell white and mooney, they would jump at Richo.
 
Harry said:
Heard on 3AW that the board is seriously thinking about trading him........goodbye richo........you can thank frawely for your departure.

If that happens then the answer is simple...It is time to trade the Board.
 
Which would have a greater effect on the club (in a positive way) - trading Richo or get rid of the coaching staff? Trading Richo isn't going to guarantee we will get any better. Trading the coaching staff - we can only get better.
 
MC24 said:
I look forward to the day when this footy Club starts to get the best out of players, rather than turning them into mixed up, maligned and resented footballers?

For the sake of the young players at the Club now and those still to come, I hope they realise how the development of players has been neglected and hurts us. If we want to go anywhere, we need someone who can get the best out of people. Skill and ability don't really mean much otherwise.
This sort of sentiment can only come from someone who is able to pinpoint the very reason why our team is at this attrocious situation.
It is heartening to see that we have intelligent posters on this messageboard who have the good of our talented young players at heart.
I seem to think that MC24, Harry, Koalahill and Rosy always make a great deal of sense with their thoughts.
I hope I score a few brownie points for this !!!
 
I think Richo would be best off somewhere else, where he can basically 'start over'. Spider on talking footy last night basically said that going to Hawthorn saved his career, and i suspect if Richo went to the 'right' club, he would be a better player. I think it makes sense for the club also, but I would personally feel better about this if we had a new coach also, one who would work with the new generation to greater effect to build the club into something.

Now is just a critical time for Richmond IMO. Rebuilding can be done quickly and to great effect, but if not done properly from the beginning, you are stuffed because the young guys lose that initial couple of years of learning that you never get back. I kind of think that this is what happened to our 95' class (Campbo, Duck, Richo etc). They were going great guns- young, exciting, then Northey left and we wasted it with dudley coaches.

SO LETS TRY AND AVOID THIS HAPPENING AGAIN.

:mad:
 
I'm a Richo fan - but unfortunately I can't see him getting out of his current rut with the current coaching staff. They have him confused and lacking confidence.
If spud is going to stay, which it looks like he will, the RFC and Richo will both be better off parting ways.
With someone like Wallace coaching us - different story.
 
Dean3 said:
KL, if they were going to trade Richo, wouldn't you think there would be board level consultation? I do.

Dean, I think that if the board said trade Richo and the Footy Dept. said "no way" then quite rightly the Footy Dept would win out. I agree that they are probably advised of things but I would hope that the final decisions on who stays and who goes come from the Footy Dept. As I said that's why the got Miller - to have a football person making football decisions.

I do know that the board does give the final OK on the final $$ amounts in big contracts. Eg. that had the final OK in the $$ *smile* was paid.
 
spiritofrichmond said:
I seem to think that MC24, Harry, Koalahill and Rosy always make a great deal of sense with their thoughts.
I hope I score a few brownie points for this !!!

:eek: ::) :eek:

What a wonderfully accurate and honest summation of the above posters Spiritofrichmond.

Consider all points earned and awarded. ;) :D

You are a breath of fresh air!

PS: Thanks
 
I getcha now KL. I'd be concerned too if the decision to trade Richo came from the board. Mind you, I've come to the point where I believe that Richo has become Richmond's Frankenstein, and we'd be better off without him. When was the last time he took a mark 25 metres out inside the corridor? I think I recall one in 1997. He continually presents, I'll give him that, but very rarely does he present in an attacking spot. Even Ben Hollland knows where to be, but you'll still find Richo snorting along the boundary line.
 
Good point, Dean 3. I'm a huge Richo fan, but he has been a wasted talent who has played his entire career under dreadful coaches in a dreadful club culture.

It's nothing against him personally, but our team is hamstrung by the RICHO FACTOR. What I mean is that for the last 8 years they have bombed the ball to him and it hasn't worked - that's not Richo's fault, it's just the Richo factor at work.

His bad habits correspond with the bad habits of the team, which won't improve until changes are made.

It's time to rebuild. Richo will not play in a Tiger premiership. It's too late. Therefore, if they can get something good for him, they should take it.

Not having him there will also force our players (and coaches) to be more creative. He would blossom in a more disciplined, skilled and professional side.